Difference between revisions of "Naming conventions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I have recently decided that using a naming convention such as category:name was very cumbersome and the pages didn't look very clean. The categorization should be handled using <nowiki>[[Category:Category Name]]</nowiki> and the pages end up looking much nice. Its just important that all new pages be given a category. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Remember, pages whos templates do not yet have the category part yet built in can still have additional category's added to them. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 00:18, 14 October 2008
I have recently decided that using a naming convention such as category:name was very cumbersome and the pages didn't look very clean. The categorization should be handled using [[Category:Category Name]] and the pages end up looking much nice. Its just important that all new pages be given a category.
Remember, pages whos templates do not yet have the category part yet built in can still have additional category's added to them.
